# Granite 4.1 8b vs Kimi K2.7 Code

> Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/granite-4-1-8b-vs-kimi-k2-7-code
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Granite 4.1 8b scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2.7 Code in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 53.5 to 36.1.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 4.1 8b | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 37.4 | 43.3 |
| Rank | 205 | 94 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.95 |
| Output $/M | — | $4 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Granite 4.1 8b: 30.1 (#297)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.9 (#95)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1192 | 1473 |
| DeepSWE | — | 30.5% |
| FrontierCode | — | 30.1% |
| SciCode | — | 47.5% |
| WeirdML | — | 54.1% |
| LMArena Coding | 1312 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 886.23 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Granite 4.1 8b: —
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 24.0 (#122)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 37.6% |
| GBAEval | — | 0.9% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 5,083 |

## Reasoning

- Granite 4.1 8b: 25.7 (#143)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 39.0 (#61)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | — | 57.9% |
| CritPt | — | 10% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 21% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1293 | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 48.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 149.97 |

## Math

- Granite 4.1 8b: 36.4 (#166)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.9 (#48)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 54% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 12.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 95.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1312 | — |

## Knowledge

- Granite 4.1 8b: 36.1 (#174)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.5 (#57)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 36.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 1309 | — |

## Multilingual

- Granite 4.1 8b: 41.7 (#204)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1261 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1337 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1240 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 4.1 8b: 66.9 (#203)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1269 | — |

## Long Context

- Granite 4.1 8b: 38.7 (#193)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1275 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 4.1 8b: 48.1 (#204)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1290 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1251 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1268 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 4.1 8b better than Kimi K2.7 Code?

Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Granite 4.1 8b or Kimi K2.7 Code better for coding?

Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.9 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 4.1 8b and Kimi K2.7 Code share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Granite 4.1 8b has 13 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.7 Code has 19.