# Granite 4.0 Micro vs Step 3.7 Flash

> Step 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index. Granite 4.0 Micro costs 10× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Step 3.7 Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/granite-4-0-micro-vs-step-3-7-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Step 3.7 Flash leads 42.9 to 12.0.
- Granite 4.0 Micro is cheaper at $0.017 / $0.11 per million input/output tokens, against $0.18 / $1.11 for Step 3.7 Flash.
- Step 3.7 Flash accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 131K.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 4.0 Micro | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 29.0 | 37.3 |
| Rank | 318 | 207 |
| Context | 131K | 256K |
| Input $/M | $0.017 | $0.18 |
| Output $/M | $0.11 | $1.11 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Granite 4.0 Micro: —
- Step 3.7 Flash: 40.0 (#150)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 40% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 694.12 |

## Reasoning

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 19.2 (#265)
- Step 3.7 Flash: 21.6 (#219)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 39.7% |
| CritPt | — | 2.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |

## Math

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 12.0 (#307)
- Step 3.7 Flash: 42.9 (#82)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 68.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 20.9% | — |

## Knowledge

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 9.9 (#304)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 28.3% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 39.5% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 30.7% | — |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 69.9 (#169)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 84.9% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 46.7 (#216)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| WildBench | 67% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 4.0 Micro better than Step 3.7 Flash?

Step 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index. Granite 4.0 Micro costs 10× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Step 3.7 Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Granite 4.0 Micro or Step 3.7 Flash?

Granite 4.0 Micro is cheaper. It lists at $0.017 per million input tokens and $0.11 per million output tokens; Step 3.7 Flash lists at $0.18 and $1.11.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Step 3.7 Flash does, with 256K tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 Micro and Step 3.7 Flash share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 Micro has 8 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.7 Flash has 5.