# Granite 4.0 Micro vs Qwen3.7 Flash

> Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/granite-4-0-micro-vs-qwen3-7-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.0 Micro scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Flash in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 48.9 to 9.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 2.8% for Granite 4.0 Micro and 86.7% for Qwen3.7 Flash.
- Granite 4.0 Micro is cheaper at $0.017 / $0.11 per million input/output tokens, against $0.03 / $0.13 for Qwen3.7 Flash.
- Qwen3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 131K.
- Granite 4.0 Micro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 4.0 Micro | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 39.5 |
| Rank | 312 | 152 |
| Context | 131K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.017 | $0.03 |
| Output $/M | $0.11 | $0.13 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Reasoning

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 18.5 (#261)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 27.3 (#108)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 23% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 43.8% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 15% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 144.62 |

## Math

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 11.2 (#301)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#100)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.8% | 86.7% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 19.3% |
| Omni-MATH | 20.9% | — |

## Knowledge

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 9.9 (#299)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#69)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 28.3% | 82.3% |
| MMLU-Pro | 39.5% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 30.7% | — |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 70.0 (#164)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 84.9% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 46.7 (#212)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| WildBench | 67% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 4.0 Micro better than Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Granite 4.0 Micro or Qwen3.7 Flash?

Granite 4.0 Micro is cheaper. It lists at $0.017 per million input tokens and $0.11 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Flash lists at $0.03 and $0.13.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 Micro and Qwen3.7 Flash share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 Micro has 8 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.