# Granite 4.0 Micro vs Qwen3.5-Flash

> Qwen3.5-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index. Granite 4.0 Micro costs 4.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.5-Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/granite-4-0-micro-vs-qwen3-5-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.0 Micro scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5-Flash in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.5-Flash leads 43.2 to 9.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 2.8% for Granite 4.0 Micro and 84.4% for Qwen3.5-Flash.
- Granite 4.0 Micro is cheaper at $0.017 / $0.11 per million input/output tokens, against $0.10 / $0.40 for Qwen3.5-Flash.
- Qwen3.5-Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 131K.
- Granite 4.0 Micro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 4.0 Micro | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 42.3 |
| Rank | 312 | 105 |
| Context | 131K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.017 | $0.10 |
| Output $/M | $0.11 | $0.40 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Granite 4.0 Micro: —
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 33.9 (#234)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1243 |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1412 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 221.8 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Granite 4.0 Micro: —
- Qwen3.5-Flash: —

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 462.69 |

## Reasoning

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 18.5 (#261)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 32.9 (#63)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 21% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1404 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 20% |
| DTBench | — | 82.9% |
| LMCA | — | 29.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 143.98 |

## Math

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 11.2 (#301)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 36.3 (#117)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.8% | 84.4% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 18.2% |
| Omni-MATH | 20.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1407 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 6.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |

## Knowledge

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 9.9 (#299)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 43.2 (#84)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 28.3% | 82.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 20.3% |
| MMLU-Pro | 39.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.5% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 30.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1408 |

## Multilingual

- Granite 4.0 Micro: —
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 50.7 (#116)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1385 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1446 |
| LMArena French | — | 1412 |
| LMArena German | — | 1389 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1369 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1344 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1379 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1399 |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 70.0 (#164)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 72.8 (#133)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 84.9% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1374 |

## Long Context

- Granite 4.0 Micro: —
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 42.4 (#119)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1392 |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 46.7 (#212)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 58.2 (#117)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1397 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1343 |
| WildBench | 67% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1393 |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 4.0 Micro better than Qwen3.5-Flash?

Qwen3.5-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index. Granite 4.0 Micro costs 4.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.5-Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Granite 4.0 Micro or Qwen3.5-Flash?

Granite 4.0 Micro is cheaper. It lists at $0.017 per million input tokens and $0.11 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5-Flash lists at $0.10 and $0.40.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.5-Flash does, with 1M tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 Micro and Qwen3.5-Flash share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 Micro has 8 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5-Flash has 32.