# Granite 4.0 Micro vs Qwen1.5-72B

> Qwen1.5-72B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/granite-4-0-micro-vs-qwen1-5-72b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Granite 4.0 Micro scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen1.5-72B in 3 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen1.5-72B leads 33.2 to 12.0.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 4.0 Micro | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.0 | 30.8 |
| Rank | 318 | 285 |
| Context | 131K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.017 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.11 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Granite 4.0 Micro: —
- Qwen1.5-72B: 31.9 (#277)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 33.2% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1165 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 40.3% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 59.1% |
| MBPP+ | — | 61.6% |

## Reasoning

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 19.2 (#265)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 22.2 (#203)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1148 |

## Math

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 12.0 (#307)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 33.2 (#205)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 20.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1164 |

## Knowledge

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 9.9 (#304)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 11.5 (#300)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 28.3% | 28.8% |
| MMLU-Pro | 39.5% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 30.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1136 |

## Multilingual

- Granite 4.0 Micro: —
- Qwen1.5-72B: 33.2 (#253)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1135 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1186 |
| LMArena French | — | 1159 |
| LMArena German | — | 1084 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1061 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1050 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1104 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1110 |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 69.9 (#169)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 59.3 (#256)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 84.9% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1141 |

## Long Context

- Granite 4.0 Micro: —
- Qwen1.5-72B: 35.1 (#243)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1157 |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 46.7 (#216)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 37.3 (#258)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1166 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1137 |
| WildBench | 67% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1160 |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 4.0 Micro better than Qwen1.5-72B?

Qwen1.5-72B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 Micro and Qwen1.5-72B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Granite 4.0 Micro has 8 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-72B has 22.