# Granite 4.0 Micro vs Pixtral Large

> Pixtral Large is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.7 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index. Granite 4.0 Micro costs 74× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Pixtral Large's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/granite-4-0-micro-vs-pixtral-large
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Granite 4.0 Micro leads 46.7 to 32.9.
- Granite 4.0 Micro is cheaper at $0.017 / $0.11 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $6 for Pixtral Large.
- Granite 4.0 Micro accepts more context: 131K tokens versus 128K.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 4.0 Micro | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 31.7 |
| Rank | 312 | 257 |
| Context | 131K | 128K |
| Input $/M | $0.017 | $2 |
| Output $/M | $0.11 | $6 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Reasoning

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 18.5 (#261)
- Pixtral Large: 20.9 (#208)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.8% |

## Math

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 11.2 (#301)
- Pixtral Large: —

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 20.9% | — |

## Knowledge

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 9.9 (#299)
- Pixtral Large: —

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 28.3% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 39.5% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 30.7% | — |

## Multimodal

- Granite 4.0 Micro: —
- Pixtral Large: 30.0 (#105)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1089 |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 70.0 (#164)
- Pixtral Large: —

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 84.9% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 46.7 (#212)
- Pixtral Large: 32.9 (#273)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 988 |
| WildBench | 67% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 4.0 Micro better than Pixtral Large?

Pixtral Large is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.7 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index. Granite 4.0 Micro costs 74× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Pixtral Large's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Granite 4.0 Micro or Pixtral Large?

Granite 4.0 Micro is cheaper. It lists at $0.017 per million input tokens and $0.11 per million output tokens; Pixtral Large lists at $2 and $6.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Granite 4.0 Micro does, with 131K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 Micro and Pixtral Large share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 Micro has 8 scored results on Noometry and Pixtral Large has 3.