# Granite 4.0 Micro vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think

> Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/granite-4-0-micro-vs-olmo-3-1-32b-think
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads 35.7 to 9.9.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 4.0 Micro | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 29.0 | 37.9 |
| Rank | 318 | 191 |
| Context | 131K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.017 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.11 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Granite 4.0 Micro: —
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.7 (#189)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1291 |

## Reasoning

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 19.2 (#265)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 25.2 (#150)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1272 |

## Math

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 12.0 (#307)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 36.3 (#168)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 20.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1305 |

## Knowledge

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 9.9 (#304)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.7 (#181)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 28.3% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 39.5% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 30.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1295 |

## Multilingual

- Granite 4.0 Micro: —
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.1 (#231)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1209 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1242 |
| LMArena French | — | 1260 |
| LMArena German | — | 1262 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1193 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1289 |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 69.9 (#169)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.6 (#218)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 84.9% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1247 |

## Long Context

- Granite 4.0 Micro: —
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#195)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1272 |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 46.7 (#216)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.2 (#220)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1272 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1226 |
| WildBench | 67% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1252 |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 4.0 Micro better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?

Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 Micro and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 Micro has 8 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.