# Granite 4.0 Micro vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct

> Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/granite-4-0-micro-vs-olmo-2-0325-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 5

## Summary

- They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.0 Micro scores higher in 2 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 3 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads 26.8 to 12.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is IFEval: 84.9% for Granite 4.0 Micro and 78% for Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 4.0 Micro | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 29.0 | 32.7 |
| Rank | 318 | 254 |
| Context | 131K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.017 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.11 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Granite 4.0 Micro: —
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1210 |

## Reasoning

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 19.2 (#265)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1208 |

## Math

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 12.0 (#307)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 20.9% | 16.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.8% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1208 |

## Knowledge

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 9.9 (#304)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 39.5% | 41.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 30.7% | 28.7% |
| GPQA Diamond | 28.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Granite 4.0 Micro: —
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1160 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1187 |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 69.9 (#169)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 84.9% | 78% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1186 |

## Long Context

- Granite 4.0 Micro: —
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1194 |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 46.7 (#216)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| WildBench | 67% | 73.4% |
| LMArena Text | — | 1218 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1199 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1221 |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 4.0 Micro better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 Micro and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 Micro has 8 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.