# Granite 4.0 Micro vs Mistral Small 3.2

> Mistral Small 3.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.2 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index. Granite 4.0 Micro costs 3.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Mistral Small 3.2's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/granite-4-0-micro-vs-mistral-small-3-2
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.0 Micro scores higher in 2 categories and Mistral Small 3.2 in 2 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Mistral Small 3.2 leads 26.7 to 9.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 2.8% for Granite 4.0 Micro and 30.3% for Mistral Small 3.2.
- Granite 4.0 Micro is cheaper at $0.017 / $0.11 per million input/output tokens, against $0.0938 / $0.25 for Mistral Small 3.2.
- Mistral Small 3.2 accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 131K.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 4.0 Micro | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 29.0 | 31.2 |
| Rank | 318 | 280 |
| Context | 131K | 256K |
| Input $/M | $0.017 | $0.0938 |
| Output $/M | $0.11 | $0.25 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Reasoning

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 19.2 (#265)
- Mistral Small 3.2: 18.1 (#287)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 1% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 40.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 131.74 |

## Math

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 12.0 (#307)
- Mistral Small 3.2: 26.3 (#260)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.8% | 30.3% |
| Omni-MATH | 20.9% | — |

## Knowledge

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 9.9 (#304)
- Mistral Small 3.2: 26.7 (#256)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 28.3% | 49.1% |
| MMLU-Pro | 39.5% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 30.7% | — |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 69.9 (#169)
- Mistral Small 3.2: —

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 84.9% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 46.7 (#216)
- Mistral Small 3.2: 45.0 (#224)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1255 |
| WildBench | 67% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 4.0 Micro better than Mistral Small 3.2?

Mistral Small 3.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.2 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index. Granite 4.0 Micro costs 3.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Mistral Small 3.2's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Granite 4.0 Micro or Mistral Small 3.2?

Granite 4.0 Micro is cheaper. It lists at $0.017 per million input tokens and $0.11 per million output tokens; Mistral Small 3.2 lists at $0.0938 and $0.25.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Mistral Small 3.2 does, with 256K tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 Micro and Mistral Small 3.2 share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 Micro has 8 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3.2 has 6.