# Granite 4.0 Micro vs Mistral Nemo

> Granite 4.0 Micro is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.0 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/granite-4-0-micro-vs-mistral-nemo
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Granite 4.0 Micro scores higher in 1 category and Mistral Nemo in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Granite 4.0 Micro leads 46.7 to 28.5.
- Granite 4.0 Micro is cheaper at $0.017 / $0.11 per million input/output tokens, against $0.15 / $0.15 for Mistral Nemo.
- Granite 4.0 Micro accepts more context: 131K tokens versus 128K.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 4.0 Micro | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 29.0 | 26.4 |
| Rank | 318 | 337 |
| Context | 131K | 128K |
| Input $/M | $0.017 | $0.15 |
| Output $/M | $0.11 | $0.15 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Granite 4.0 Micro: —
- Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#125)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 27.6% |
| BALROG | — | 17.6% |

## Reasoning

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 19.2 (#265)
- Mistral Nemo: 20.7 (#232)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| DTBench | — | 48.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 118.68 |
| PIQA | — | 83.5% |

## Math

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 12.0 (#307)
- Mistral Nemo: 25.5 (#268)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 20.9% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 10.8% |
| GSM8K | — | 84.2% |

## Knowledge

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 9.9 (#304)
- Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#298)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 28.3% | 29.9% |
| MMLU-Pro | 39.5% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 30.7% | — |
| BoolQ | — | 82.5% |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 69.9 (#169)
- Mistral Nemo: —

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 84.9% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 46.7 (#216)
- Mistral Nemo: 28.5 (#296)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 881 |
| WildBench | 67% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 4.0 Micro better than Mistral Nemo?

Granite 4.0 Micro is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.0 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Granite 4.0 Micro or Mistral Nemo?

Granite 4.0 Micro is cheaper. It lists at $0.017 per million input tokens and $0.11 per million output tokens; Mistral Nemo lists at $0.15 and $0.15.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Granite 4.0 Micro does, with 131K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 Micro and Mistral Nemo share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Granite 4.0 Micro has 8 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Nemo has 10.