# Granite 4.0 Micro vs Magistral Small

> Magistral Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.2 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index. Granite 4.0 Micro costs 18× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Magistral Small's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/granite-4-0-micro-vs-magistral-small
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.0 Micro scores higher in 1 category and Magistral Small in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Magistral Small leads 30.9 to 9.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 28.3% for Granite 4.0 Micro and 56.1% for Magistral Small.
- Granite 4.0 Micro is cheaper at $0.017 / $0.11 per million input/output tokens, against $0.50 / $1.50 for Magistral Small.
- Granite 4.0 Micro accepts more context: 131K tokens versus 128K.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 4.0 Micro | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 29.0 | 30.2 |
| Rank | 318 | 296 |
| Context | 131K | 128K |
| Input $/M | $0.017 | $0.50 |
| Output $/M | $0.11 | $1.50 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Granite 4.0 Micro: —
- Magistral Small: 38.4 (#176)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 35.2% |

## Reasoning

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 19.2 (#265)
- Magistral Small: 6.8 (#350)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 3% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 6.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 5% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| DTBench | — | 61.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 133.19 |

## Math

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 12.0 (#307)
- Magistral Small: 26.2 (#261)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.8% | 30% |
| Omni-MATH | 20.9% | — |

## Knowledge

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 9.9 (#304)
- Magistral Small: 30.9 (#223)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 28.3% | 56.1% |
| MMLU-Pro | 39.5% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 30.7% | — |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 69.9 (#169)
- Magistral Small: —

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 84.9% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 46.7 (#216)
- Magistral Small: —

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| WildBench | 67% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 4.0 Micro better than Magistral Small?

Magistral Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.2 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index. Granite 4.0 Micro costs 18× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Magistral Small's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Granite 4.0 Micro or Magistral Small?

Granite 4.0 Micro is cheaper. It lists at $0.017 per million input tokens and $0.11 per million output tokens; Magistral Small lists at $0.50 and $1.50.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Granite 4.0 Micro does, with 131K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 Micro and Magistral Small share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 Micro has 8 scored results on Noometry and Magistral Small has 10.