# Granite 4.0 Micro vs Llama 3.2 3B

> Granite 4.0 Micro and Llama 3.2 3B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (28.8 vs 28.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/granite-4-0-micro-vs-llama-3-2-3b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Granite 4.0 Micro leads 46.7 to 24.9.
- Granite 4.0 Micro is cheaper at $0.017 / $0.11 per million input/output tokens, against $0.05 / $0.33 for Llama 3.2 3B.
- Llama 3.2 3B accepts more context: 131K tokens versus 131K.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 4.0 Micro | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 28.4 |
| Rank | 312 | 318 |
| Context | 131K | 131K |
| Input $/M | $0.017 | $0.05 |
| Output $/M | $0.11 | $0.33 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Granite 4.0 Micro: —
- Llama 3.2 3B: 27.1 (#314)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 23.4% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1098 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 28.3% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Granite 4.0 Micro: —
- Llama 3.2 3B: 19.9 (#135)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 21.9% |
| BALROG | — | 10.1% |

## Reasoning

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 18.5 (#261)
- Llama 3.2 3B: 20.1 (#225)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1095 |

## Math

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 11.2 (#301)
- Llama 3.2 3B: 29.9 (#213)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 20.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1126 |

## Knowledge

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 9.9 (#299)
- Llama 3.2 3B: 29.1 (#232)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 28.3% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 39.5% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 30.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1090 |

## Multilingual

- Granite 4.0 Micro: —
- Llama 3.2 3B: 26.4 (#276)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1019 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1017 |
| LMArena German | — | 1056 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 949 |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 70.0 (#164)
- Llama 3.2 3B: 56.3 (#270)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 84.9% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1089 |

## Long Context

- Granite 4.0 Micro: —
- Llama 3.2 3B: 33.4 (#256)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1101 |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 46.7 (#212)
- Llama 3.2 3B: 24.9 (#302)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1110 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1094 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 595 |
| WildBench | 67% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1105 |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 4.0 Micro better than Llama 3.2 3B?

Granite 4.0 Micro and Llama 3.2 3B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (28.8 vs 28.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Which is cheaper, Granite 4.0 Micro or Llama 3.2 3B?

Granite 4.0 Micro is cheaper. It lists at $0.017 per million input tokens and $0.11 per million output tokens; Llama 3.2 3B lists at $0.05 and $0.33.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Llama 3.2 3B does, with 131K tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 Micro and Llama 3.2 3B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 Micro has 8 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 3B has 18.