# Granite 4.0 Micro vs Llama 2-70B

> Granite 4.0 Micro is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.8 to 24.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/granite-4-0-micro-vs-llama-2-70b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.0 Micro scores higher in 5 categories and Llama 2-70B in 0 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Granite 4.0 Micro leads 70.0 to 55.1.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 4.0 Micro | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 24.1 |
| Rank | 312 | 343 |
| Context | 131K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.017 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.11 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Granite 4.0 Micro: —
- Llama 2-70B: 30.8 (#281)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1079 |

## Reasoning

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 18.5 (#261)
- Llama 2-70B: 13.7 (#324)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1073 |
| DTBench | — | 41.6% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 64.9% |
| CommonsenseQA 2.0 | — | 50% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 113.59 |
| ForecastBench | — | 51.4 |
| HellaSwag | — | 85.3% |
| LAMBADA | — | 78.9% |
| PIQA | — | 82.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 80.2% |

## Math

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 11.2 (#301)
- Llama 2-70B: 7.5 (#320)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.8% | 0% |
| Omni-MATH | 20.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1091 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 3.3% |
| GSM8K | — | 69.6% |

## Knowledge

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 9.9 (#299)
- Llama 2-70B: 7.4 (#305)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 28.3% | 26.3% |
| MMLU-Pro | 39.5% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 30.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1039 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 78.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 88.6% |
| MMLU | — | 69.9% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 60.2% |
| TriviaQA | — | 87.6% |

## Multilingual

- Granite 4.0 Micro: —
- Llama 2-70B: 27.9 (#269)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1045 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 994 |
| LMArena French | — | 1089 |
| LMArena German | — | 1041 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 927 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 964 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1142 |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 70.0 (#164)
- Llama 2-70B: 55.1 (#273)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 84.9% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1071 |

## Long Context

- Granite 4.0 Micro: —
- Llama 2-70B: 32.2 (#265)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1062 |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 46.7 (#212)
- Llama 2-70B: 32.5 (#274)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1115 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1075 |
| WildBench | 67% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1088 |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 4.0 Micro better than Llama 2-70B?

Granite 4.0 Micro is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.8 to 24.1 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 Micro and Llama 2-70B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 Micro has 8 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-70B has 35.