# Granite 4.0 Micro vs Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo

> Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/granite-4-0-micro-vs-kimi-k2-thinking-turbo
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.0 Micro scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads 50.9 to 9.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 2.8% for Granite 4.0 Micro and 83.1% for Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 4.0 Micro | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 29.0 | 45.8 |
| Rank | 318 | 70 |
| Context | 131K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.017 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.11 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Granite 4.0 Micro: —
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.4 (#178)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1322 |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1454 |

## Reasoning

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 19.2 (#265)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 32.5 (#75)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 20% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1428 |

## Math

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 12.0 (#307)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 47.4 (#68)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.8% | 83.1% |
| Omni-MATH | 20.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1429 |

## Knowledge

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 9.9 (#304)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#69)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 28.3% | 84.2% |
| MMLU-Pro | 39.5% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 30.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1439 |

## Multilingual

- Granite 4.0 Micro: —
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.4 (#109)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1398 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1456 |
| LMArena French | — | 1425 |
| LMArena German | — | 1390 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1357 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1330 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1391 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1406 |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 69.9 (#169)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.0 (#109)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 84.9% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1403 |

## Long Context

- Granite 4.0 Micro: —
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#102)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1415 |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 46.7 (#216)
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.0 (#104)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1415 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1374 |
| WildBench | 67% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1414 |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 4.0 Micro better than Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo?

Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 Micro and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 Micro has 8 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21.