# Granite 4.0 Micro vs Kimi K2.6

> Kimi K2.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index. Granite 4.0 Micro costs 42× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Kimi K2.6's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/granite-4-0-micro-vs-kimi-k2-6
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.0 Micro scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2.6 in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2.6 leads 56.8 to 11.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 2.8% for Granite 4.0 Micro and 96.1% for Kimi K2.6.
- Granite 4.0 Micro is cheaper at $0.017 / $0.11 per million input/output tokens, against $0.95 / $4 for Kimi K2.6.
- Kimi K2.6 accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 131K.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 4.0 Micro | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 47.5 |
| Rank | 312 | 52 |
| Context | 131K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.017 | $0.95 |
| Output $/M | $0.11 | $4 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Granite 4.0 Micro: —
- Kimi K2.6: 50.5 (#41)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 76.7% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1509 |
| SciCode | — | 53.5% |
| WeirdML | — | 55.9% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1488 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,093 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Granite 4.0 Micro: —
- Kimi K2.6: 21.8 (#128)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 4.6% |
| ExploitBench | — | 18.4% |
| GBAEval | — | 0.9% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 12% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 6,205 |

## Reasoning

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 18.5 (#261)
- Kimi K2.6: 39.6 (#51)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 26% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 87.2% |
| CritPt | — | 8% |
| EBR-Bench | — | 2.4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1470 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 18% |
| DTBench | — | 90.9% |
| LMCA | — | 37.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 151.03 |

## Math

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 11.2 (#301)
- Kimi K2.6: 56.8 (#34)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.8% | 96.1% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 57.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 25.6% |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 72.9% |
| ProofBench | — | 16% |
| Omni-MATH | 20.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1475 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 39% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 14.6% |

## Knowledge

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 9.9 (#299)
- Kimi K2.6: 53.9 (#48)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 28.3% | 90.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 34.9% |
| MMLU-Pro | 39.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.8% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 30.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1491 |

## Multimodal

- Granite 4.0 Micro: —
- Kimi K2.6: 31.8 (#95)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1282 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 3.9% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 21.7% |
| LMArena Document | — | 1451 |

## Multilingual

- Granite 4.0 Micro: —
- Kimi K2.6: 55.1 (#35)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1446 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1521 |
| LMArena French | — | 1471 |
| LMArena German | — | 1449 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1442 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1428 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1446 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1463 |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 70.0 (#164)
- Kimi K2.6: 76.5 (#40)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 84.9% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1451 |

## Long Context

- Granite 4.0 Micro: —
- Kimi K2.6: 44.9 (#50)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1468 |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 46.7 (#212)
- Kimi K2.6: 68.7 (#25)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1434 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1725 |
| WildBench | 67% | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1202 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1453 |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 4.0 Micro better than Kimi K2.6?

Kimi K2.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index. Granite 4.0 Micro costs 42× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Kimi K2.6's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Granite 4.0 Micro or Kimi K2.6?

Granite 4.0 Micro is cheaper. It lists at $0.017 per million input tokens and $0.11 per million output tokens; Kimi K2.6 lists at $0.95 and $4.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Kimi K2.6 does, with 262K tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 Micro and Kimi K2.6 share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 Micro has 8 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.6 has 51.