# Granite 4.0 Micro vs Inkling

> Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index. Granite 4.0 Micro costs 63× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Inkling's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/granite-4-0-micro-vs-inkling
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.0 Micro scores higher in 0 categories and Inkling in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Inkling leads 55.2 to 9.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 2.8% for Granite 4.0 Micro and 88.9% for Inkling.
- Granite 4.0 Micro is cheaper at $0.017 / $0.11 per million input/output tokens, against $1.87 / $4.68 for Inkling.
- Granite 4.0 Micro accepts more context: 131K tokens versus 66K.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 4.0 Micro | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Thinking Machines Lab |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 44.1 |
| Rank | 312 | 75 |
| Context | 131K | 66K |
| Input $/M | $0.017 | $1.87 |
| Output $/M | $0.11 | $4.68 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Granite 4.0 Micro: —
- Inkling: 34.1 (#229)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierCode | — | 14% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1412 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 4.1% |
| SciCode | — | 47% |
| WeirdML | — | 32.3% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1463 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 946 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Granite 4.0 Micro: —
- Inkling: 29.5 (#76)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 33.8% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 25% |

## Reasoning

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 18.5 (#261)
- Inkling: 40.6 (#48)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 21% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 36.5% |
| SimpleBench | — | 50% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 79.5% |
| CritPt | — | 5.4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1452 |
| DTBench | — | 87.5% |
| LMCA | — | 37.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 148.6 |

## Math

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 11.2 (#301)
- Inkling: 31.2 (#198)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.8% | 88.9% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 33.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 4.9% |
| ProofBench | — | 0% |
| Omni-MATH | 20.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1482 |

## Knowledge

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 9.9 (#299)
- Inkling: 55.2 (#44)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 28.3% | 88.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 40.3% |
| MMLU-Pro | 39.5% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 30.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1468 |

## Multilingual

- Granite 4.0 Micro: —
- Inkling: 54.2 (#49)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1434 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1495 |
| LMArena French | — | 1453 |
| LMArena German | — | 1456 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1428 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1401 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1430 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1442 |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 70.0 (#164)
- Inkling: 75.3 (#65)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 84.9% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1427 |

## Long Context

- Granite 4.0 Micro: —
- Inkling: 43.9 (#79)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1436 |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 4.0 Micro: 46.7 (#212)
- Inkling: 65.5 (#48)

| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1443 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1390 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1611 |
| WildBench | 67% | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1226 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1436 |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 4.0 Micro better than Inkling?

Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index. Granite 4.0 Micro costs 63× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Inkling's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Granite 4.0 Micro or Inkling?

Granite 4.0 Micro is cheaper. It lists at $0.017 per million input tokens and $0.11 per million output tokens; Inkling lists at $1.87 and $4.68.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Granite 4.0 Micro does, with 131K tokens against 66K.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 Micro and Inkling share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 Micro has 8 scored results on Noometry and Inkling has 41.