# Granite 3.1 8b Instruct vs Qwen3.7 Plus

> Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/granite-3-1-8b-instruct-vs-qwen3-7-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.1 8b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.7 Plus in 8 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 64.3 to 35.5.
- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.4 | 45.3 |
| Rank | 258 | 72 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.60 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 34.5 (#233)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1186 | 1473 |
| FrontierCode | — | 10.2% |
| SciCode | — | 45.5% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 24.1 (#120)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 27.1% | — |
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 2.8% |

## Reasoning

- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 22.1 (#207)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1145 | 1460 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 74.8% |
| CritPt | — | 9.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 24% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 84% |
| LMCA | — | 37.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 147.37 |

## Math

- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 33.0 (#209)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1152 | 1466 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 34.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 93.3% |

## Knowledge

- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#220)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1142 | 1467 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87.9% |

## Multimodal

- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1279 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1444 |

## Multilingual

- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 30.9 (#260)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1099 | 1445 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1145 | 1510 |
| LMArena Russian | 1092 | 1457 |
| LMArena French | — | 1473 |
| LMArena German | — | 1471 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1413 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1415 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1457 |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 58.6 (#259)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1131 | 1440 |

## Long Context

- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.2 (#241)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1162 | 1455 |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.5 (#266)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1150 | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1129 | 1439 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1108 | 1460 |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 3.1 8b Instruct better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Granite 3.1 8b Instruct or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

Qwen3.7 Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.6 versus 34.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.1 8b Instruct has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.