# Granite 3.1 8b Instruct vs Olmo 7b Instruct

> Granite 3.1 8b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/granite-3-1-8b-instruct-vs-olmo-7b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.1 8b Instruct scores higher in 6 categories and Olmo 7b Instruct in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads 35.7 to 26.0.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 31.8 | 29.7 |
| Rank | 256 | 293 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 33.9 (#232)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.1 (#298)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1186 | 1016 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 23.9 (#113)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 27.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 21.2 (#204)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.0 (#273)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1146 | 993 |

## Math

- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 30.4 (#210)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: 27.8 (#234)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1152 | 1018 |

## Knowledge

- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 30.6 (#218)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1142 | — |

## Multilingual

- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#255)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.1 (#286)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1099 | 977 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1145 | 1013 |
| LMArena Russian | 1092 | 946 |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 58.9 (#254)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.3 (#296)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1131 | 978 |

## Long Context

- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.2 (#236)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1162 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.7 (#261)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: 26.0 (#298)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1150 | 1032 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1129 | 990 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1108 | 1007 |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 3.1 8b Instruct better than Olmo 7b Instruct?

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Granite 3.1 8b Instruct or Olmo 7b Instruct better for coding?

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.9 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and Olmo 7b Instruct share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.1 8b Instruct has 13 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 7b Instruct has 10.