# Granite 3.1 8b Instruct vs Olmo 3 32b Think

> Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/granite-3-1-8b-instruct-vs-olmo-3-32b-think
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.1 8b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Olmo 3 32b Think leads 49.2 to 35.7.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 31.8 | 38.1 |
| Rank | 256 | 182 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 33.9 (#232)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.0 (#169)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1186 | 1318 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 23.9 (#113)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: —

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 27.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 21.2 (#204)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 24.9 (#138)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1146 | 1302 |

## Math

- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 30.4 (#210)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 33.8 (#165)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1152 | 1315 |

## Knowledge

- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 30.6 (#218)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 34.4 (#189)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1142 | 1272 |

## Multilingual

- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#255)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.4 (#205)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1099 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1145 | 1300 |
| LMArena Russian | 1092 | 1255 |
| LMArena French | — | 1291 |
| LMArena German | — | 1290 |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 58.9 (#254)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.4 (#193)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1131 | 1275 |

## Long Context

- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.2 (#236)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#177)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1162 | 1296 |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.7 (#261)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.2 (#188)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1150 | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1129 | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1108 | 1289 |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 3.1 8b Instruct better than Olmo 3 32b Think?

Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Granite 3.1 8b Instruct or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?

Olmo 3 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.0 versus 33.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and Olmo 3 32b Think share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.1 8b Instruct has 13 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.