# Granite 3.1 8b Instruct vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

> MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/granite-3-1-8b-instruct-vs-mimo-v2-6-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.1 8b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 63.1 to 35.5.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 32.4 | 48.5 |
| Rank | 258 | 55 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.28 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 34.5 (#233)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1186 | 1504 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1637 |
| SciCode | — | 51.3% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 24.1 (#120)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: —

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 27.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 22.1 (#207)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1145 | 1482 |
| CritPt | — | 12% |

## Math

- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 33.0 (#209)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1152 | 1468 |
| ProofBench | — | 63% |

## Knowledge

- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#220)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1142 | 1501 |

## Multimodal

- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1259 |

## Multilingual

- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 30.9 (#260)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1099 | 1434 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1145 | 1511 |
| LMArena Russian | 1092 | 1409 |
| LMArena French | — | 1475 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1456 |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 58.6 (#259)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1131 | 1463 |

## Long Context

- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.2 (#241)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1162 | 1463 |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.5 (#266)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1150 | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1129 | 1400 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1108 | 1451 |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 3.1 8b Instruct better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Granite 3.1 8b Instruct or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 34.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.1 8b Instruct has 13 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19.