# Granite 3.1 8b Instruct vs Magistral Small

> Granite 3.1 8b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/granite-3-1-8b-instruct-vs-magistral-small
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads 22.1 to 6.8.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 32.4 | 30.2 |
| Rank | 258 | 296 |
| Context | — | 128K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.50 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.50 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 34.5 (#233)
- Magistral Small: 38.4 (#176)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 35.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1186 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 24.1 (#120)
- Magistral Small: —

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 27.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 22.1 (#207)
- Magistral Small: 6.8 (#350)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 6.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 5% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1145 | — |
| DTBench | — | 61.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 133.19 |

## Math

- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 33.0 (#209)
- Magistral Small: 26.2 (#261)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 30% |
| LMArena Math | 1152 | — |

## Knowledge

- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#220)
- Magistral Small: 30.9 (#223)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1142 | — |

## Multilingual

- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 30.9 (#260)
- Magistral Small: —

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1099 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1145 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1092 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 58.6 (#259)
- Magistral Small: —

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1131 | — |

## Long Context

- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.2 (#241)
- Magistral Small: —

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1162 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.5 (#266)
- Magistral Small: —

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1150 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1129 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1108 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 3.1 8b Instruct better than Magistral Small?

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Granite 3.1 8b Instruct or Magistral Small better for coding?

Magistral Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.4 versus 34.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and Magistral Small share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.1 8b Instruct has 13 scored results on Noometry and Magistral Small has 10.