# Granite 3.1 8b Instruct vs Llama 2-13B

> Granite 3.1 8b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/granite-3-1-8b-instruct-vs-llama-2-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.1 8b Instruct scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 2-13B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads 22.1 to 12.8.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 32.4 | 29.6 |
| Rank | 258 | 309 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 34.5 (#233)
- Llama 2-13B: 30.9 (#291)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1186 | 1062 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 24.1 (#120)
- Llama 2-13B: —

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 27.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 22.1 (#207)
- Llama 2-13B: 12.8 (#337)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1145 | 1051 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| DTBench | — | 42.2% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 58.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 106.17 |
| HellaSwag | — | 80.7% |
| LAMBADA | — | 76.5% |
| PIQA | — | 80.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 72.8% |

## Math

- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 33.0 (#209)
- Llama 2-13B: 31.1 (#229)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1152 | 1065 |
| GSM8K | — | 36.9% |

## Knowledge

- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#220)
- Llama 2-13B: 28.1 (#249)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1142 | 1030 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 60.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 82.4% |
| MMLU | — | 55.6% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 57% |
| TriviaQA | — | 79.6% |

## Multimodal

- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: —
- Llama 2-13B: —

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | — | 55.8% |

## Multilingual

- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 30.9 (#260)
- Llama 2-13B: 26.5 (#279)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1099 | 1024 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1145 | 1001 |
| LMArena Russian | 1092 | 1055 |
| LMArena French | — | 1044 |
| LMArena German | — | 1009 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 894 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 953 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1087 |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 58.6 (#259)
- Llama 2-13B: 53.3 (#287)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1131 | 1045 |

## Long Context

- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.2 (#241)
- Llama 2-13B: 32.3 (#269)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1162 | 1064 |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.5 (#266)
- Llama 2-13B: 29.8 (#289)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1150 | 1084 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1129 | 1047 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1108 | 1050 |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 3.1 8b Instruct better than Llama 2-13B?

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Granite 3.1 8b Instruct or Llama 2-13B better for coding?

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.5 versus 30.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and Llama 2-13B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.1 8b Instruct has 13 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-13B has 32.