# Granite 3.1 2b Instruct vs Wizardlm 70b

> Granite 3.1 2b Instruct and Wizardlm 70b score almost the same on the Noometry Index (33.2 vs 33.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/granite-3-1-2b-instruct-vs-wizardlm-70b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.1 2b Instruct scores higher in 5 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 2 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 33.2 | 33.0 |
| Rank | 247 | 249 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.4 (#257)
- Wizardlm 70b: 31.4 (#285)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1149 | 1081 |

## Reasoning

- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 22.0 (#209)
- Wizardlm 70b: 20.7 (#234)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1138 | 1079 |

## Math

- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.1 (#206)
- Wizardlm 70b: 32.2 (#218)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1159 | 1116 |

## Knowledge

- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 30.8 (#224)
- Wizardlm 70b: —

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1131 | — |

## Multilingual

- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 29.1 (#269)
- Wizardlm 70b: 29.6 (#265)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1068 | 1078 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1139 | 1052 |
| LMArena Russian | 1063 | 1155 |
| LMArena German | — | 1083 |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 57.7 (#264)
- Wizardlm 70b: 56.3 (#273)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1116 | 1093 |

## Long Context

- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 35.0 (#244)
- Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#263)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1155 | 1097 |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 34.1 (#274)
- Wizardlm 70b: 34.8 (#269)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1127 | 1120 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1116 | 1149 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1099 | 1108 |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 3.1 2b Instruct better than Wizardlm 70b?

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct and Wizardlm 70b score almost the same on the Noometry Index (33.2 vs 33.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Granite 3.1 2b Instruct or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.4 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 3.1 2b Instruct and Wizardlm 70b share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.1 2b Instruct has 12 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.