# Granite 3.1 2b Instruct vs Wizardlm 13b

> Granite 3.1 2b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.6 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/granite-3-1-2b-instruct-vs-wizardlm-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.1 2b Instruct scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads 58.0 to 53.7.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 32.6 | 30.8 |
| Rank | 243 | 272 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 32.9 (#255)
- Wizardlm 13b: 29.6 (#293)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1149 | 1035 |

## Reasoning

- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 21.0 (#206)
- Wizardlm 13b: 18.5 (#265)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1138 | 1018 |

## Math

- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 30.6 (#206)
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.8 (#235)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1159 | 1017 |

## Knowledge

- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 30.3 (#223)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1131 | — |

## Multilingual

- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 29.2 (#264)
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.3 (#272)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1068 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1138 | 1023 |
| LMArena Russian | 1063 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 58.0 (#259)
- Wizardlm 13b: 53.7 (#280)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1116 | 1049 |

## Long Context

- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 35.0 (#239)
- Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#268)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1155 | 1054 |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 34.3 (#269)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.7 (#282)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1127 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1116 | 1090 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1099 | 1047 |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 3.1 2b Instruct better than Wizardlm 13b?

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.6 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Granite 3.1 2b Instruct or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.9 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 3.1 2b Instruct and Wizardlm 13b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.1 2b Instruct has 12 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.