# Granite 3.1 2b Instruct vs Palm 2

> Granite 3.1 2b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.2 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/granite-3-1-2b-instruct-vs-palm-2
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.1 2b Instruct scores higher in 7 categories and Palm 2 in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads 34.1 to 25.6.
- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Google |
| Noometry Index | 33.2 | 30.0 |
| Rank | 247 | 298 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.4 (#257)
- Palm 2: 29.0 (#311)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1149 | 994 |

## Reasoning

- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 22.0 (#209)
- Palm 2: 19.1 (#271)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1138 | 1005 |

## Math

- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.1 (#206)
- Palm 2: 30.8 (#231)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1159 | 1049 |

## Knowledge

- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 30.8 (#224)
- Palm 2: —

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1131 | — |

## Multilingual

- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 29.1 (#269)
- Palm 2: 20.9 (#295)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1068 | 916 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1139 | 887 |
| LMArena Russian | 1063 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 57.7 (#264)
- Palm 2: 51.0 (#296)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1116 | 1010 |

## Long Context

- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 35.0 (#244)
- Palm 2: 30.8 (#285)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1155 | 1010 |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 34.1 (#274)
- Palm 2: 25.6 (#304)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1127 | 1027 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1116 | 991 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1099 | 994 |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 3.1 2b Instruct better than Palm 2?

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.2 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Granite 3.1 2b Instruct or Palm 2 better for coding?

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.4 versus 29.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 3.1 2b Instruct and Palm 2 share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.1 2b Instruct has 12 scored results on Noometry and Palm 2 has 10.