# Granite 3.1 2b Instruct vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

> MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 32.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/granite-3-1-2b-instruct-vs-mimo-v2-6-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.1 2b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 63.9 to 34.3.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 32.6 | 44.4 |
| Rank | 243 | 74 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.28 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 32.9 (#255)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.3 (#68)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1149 | 1516 |

## Reasoning

- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 21.0 (#206)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 29.6 (#82)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1138 | 1481 |

## Math

- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 30.6 (#206)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 37.4 (#97)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1159 | 1477 |

## Knowledge

- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 30.3 (#223)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.0 (#91)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1131 | 1516 |

## Multimodal

- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.2 (#39)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1266 |

## Multilingual

- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 29.2 (#264)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.6 (#41)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1068 | 1439 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1138 | 1501 |
| LMArena Russian | 1063 | 1424 |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 58.0 (#259)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 77.0 (#33)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1116 | 1463 |

## Long Context

- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 35.0 (#239)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#52)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1155 | 1465 |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 34.3 (#269)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.9 (#61)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1127 | 1459 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1116 | 1408 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1099 | 1460 |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 3.1 2b Instruct better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 32.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Granite 3.1 2b Instruct or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.3 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 3.1 2b Instruct and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.1 2b Instruct has 12 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 13.