# Granite 3.1 2b Instruct vs Llama 2-70B

> Granite 3.1 2b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.6 to 24.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/granite-3-1-2b-instruct-vs-llama-2-70b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.1 2b Instruct scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 2-70B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads 30.6 to 7.5.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 32.6 | 24.1 |
| Rank | 243 | 343 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 32.9 (#255)
- Llama 2-70B: 30.8 (#281)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1149 | 1079 |

## Reasoning

- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 21.0 (#206)
- Llama 2-70B: 13.7 (#324)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1138 | 1073 |
| DTBench | — | 41.6% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 64.9% |
| CommonsenseQA 2.0 | — | 50% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 113.59 |
| ForecastBench | — | 51.4 |
| HellaSwag | — | 85.3% |
| LAMBADA | — | 78.9% |
| PIQA | — | 82.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 80.2% |

## Math

- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 30.6 (#206)
- Llama 2-70B: 7.5 (#320)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1159 | 1091 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 0% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 3.3% |
| GSM8K | — | 69.6% |

## Knowledge

- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 30.3 (#223)
- Llama 2-70B: 7.4 (#305)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1131 | 1039 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 26.3% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 78.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 88.6% |
| MMLU | — | 69.9% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 60.2% |
| TriviaQA | — | 87.6% |

## Multilingual

- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 29.2 (#264)
- Llama 2-70B: 27.9 (#269)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1068 | 1045 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1138 | 994 |
| LMArena Russian | 1063 | 1083 |
| LMArena French | — | 1089 |
| LMArena German | — | 1041 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 927 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 964 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1142 |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 58.0 (#259)
- Llama 2-70B: 55.1 (#273)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1116 | 1071 |

## Long Context

- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 35.0 (#239)
- Llama 2-70B: 32.2 (#265)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1155 | 1062 |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 34.3 (#269)
- Llama 2-70B: 32.5 (#274)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1127 | 1115 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1116 | 1075 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1099 | 1088 |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 3.1 2b Instruct better than Llama 2-70B?

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.6 to 24.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Granite 3.1 2b Instruct or Llama 2-70B better for coding?

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.9 versus 30.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 3.1 2b Instruct and Llama 2-70B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.1 2b Instruct has 12 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-70B has 35.