# Granite 3.1 2b Instruct vs Kimi K2.6

> Kimi K2.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.7 to 33.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/granite-3-1-2b-instruct-vs-kimi-k2-6
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.1 2b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2.6 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K2.6 leads 68.5 to 34.1.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 33.2 | 47.7 |
| Rank | 247 | 60 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.95 |
| Output $/M | — | $4 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.4 (#257)
- Kimi K2.6: 50.7 (#43)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1149 | 1488 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 76.7% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1509 |
| SciCode | — | 53.5% |
| WeirdML | — | 55.9% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,093 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: —
- Kimi K2.6: 21.9 (#137)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 4.6% |
| ExploitBench | — | 18.4% |
| GBAEval | — | 0.9% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 12% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 6,205 |

## Reasoning

- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 22.0 (#209)
- Kimi K2.6: 40.5 (#55)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1138 | 1470 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 87.2% |
| CritPt | — | 8% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 26% |
| EBR-Bench | — | 2.4% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 18% |
| DTBench | — | 90.9% |
| LMCA | — | 37.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 151.05 |

## Math

- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.1 (#206)
- Kimi K2.6: 57.0 (#41)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1159 | 1475 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 57.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 25.6% |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 72.9% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 96.1% |
| ProofBench | — | 16% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 39% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 14.6% |

## Knowledge

- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 30.8 (#224)
- Kimi K2.6: 54.0 (#54)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1131 | 1491 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 90.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 34.9% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.8% |

## Multimodal

- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: —
- Kimi K2.6: 31.6 (#103)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1283 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 3.9% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 21.7% |
| LMArena Document | — | 1451 |

## Multilingual

- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 29.1 (#269)
- Kimi K2.6: 54.9 (#37)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1068 | 1446 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1139 | 1521 |
| LMArena Russian | 1063 | 1446 |
| LMArena French | — | 1471 |
| LMArena German | — | 1450 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1443 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1427 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1464 |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 57.7 (#264)
- Kimi K2.6: 76.3 (#43)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1116 | 1451 |

## Long Context

- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 35.0 (#244)
- Kimi K2.6: 44.9 (#52)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1155 | 1468 |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 34.1 (#274)
- Kimi K2.6: 68.5 (#26)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1127 | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1116 | 1434 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1099 | 1453 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1725 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1202 |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 3.1 2b Instruct better than Kimi K2.6?

Kimi K2.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.7 to 33.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Granite 3.1 2b Instruct or Kimi K2.6 better for coding?

Kimi K2.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.7 versus 33.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 3.1 2b Instruct and Kimi K2.6 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.1 2b Instruct has 12 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.6 has 51.