# Granite 3.1 2b Instruct vs Inkling-Small

> Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 33.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/granite-3-1-2b-instruct-vs-inkling-small
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.1 2b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Inkling-Small in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Inkling-Small leads 59.6 to 34.1.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Thinking Machines Lab |
| Noometry Index | 33.2 | 46.5 |
| Rank | 247 | 63 |
| Context | — | 524K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.45 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.4 (#257)
- Inkling-Small: 43.6 (#85)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1149 | 1451 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1409 |
| SciCode | — | 48.7% |

## Reasoning

- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 22.0 (#209)
- Inkling-Small: 38.6 (#63)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1138 | 1423 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 40.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 84% |
| CritPt | — | 8.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 18% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 150.15 |

## Math

- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.1 (#206)
- Inkling-Small: 45.1 (#77)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1159 | 1459 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 46.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 17.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 90% |
| ProofBench | — | 6% |

## Knowledge

- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 30.8 (#224)
- Inkling-Small: 48.2 (#77)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1131 | 1442 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 88.5% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 19.1% |

## Multimodal

- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: —
- Inkling-Small: 39.1 (#62)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1235 |

## Multilingual

- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 29.1 (#269)
- Inkling-Small: 51.7 (#104)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1068 | 1402 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1139 | 1465 |
| LMArena Russian | 1063 | 1391 |
| LMArena French | — | 1436 |
| LMArena German | — | 1405 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1405 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1363 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1428 |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 57.7 (#264)
- Inkling-Small: 73.8 (#114)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1116 | 1399 |

## Long Context

- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 35.0 (#244)
- Inkling-Small: 42.7 (#118)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1155 | 1401 |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 34.1 (#274)
- Inkling-Small: 59.6 (#107)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1127 | 1414 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1116 | 1331 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1099 | 1418 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1491 |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 3.1 2b Instruct better than Inkling-Small?

Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 33.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Granite 3.1 2b Instruct or Inkling-Small better for coding?

Inkling-Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.6 versus 33.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 3.1 2b Instruct and Inkling-Small share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.1 2b Instruct has 12 scored results on Noometry and Inkling-Small has 33.