# Granite 3.0 8b Instruct vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct

> Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 31.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/granite-3-0-8b-instruct-vs-olmo-3-1-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.0 8b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads 50.2 to 31.1.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 3.0 8b Instruct | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 31.6 | 39.4 |
| Rank | 270 | 168 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.7 (#301)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 8b Instruct | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | 1347 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29.3% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 35.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 20.9 (#230)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 8b Instruct | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1092 | 1322 |

## Math

- Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 32.8 (#210)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 8b Instruct | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1143 | 1305 |

## Knowledge

- Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.6 (#236)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 8b Instruct | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1087 | 1308 |

## Multilingual

- Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 27.2 (#276)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 8b Instruct | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1037 | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1063 | 1304 |
| LMArena Russian | 1060 | 1268 |
| LMArena French | — | 1328 |
| LMArena German | — | 1282 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1206 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1336 |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 56.0 (#276)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 8b Instruct | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1088 | 1299 |

## Long Context

- Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 34.0 (#252)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 8b Instruct | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1122 | 1312 |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#285)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 8b Instruct | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1096 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1071 | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1063 | 1309 |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 3.0 8b Instruct better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 31.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Granite 3.0 8b Instruct or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 29.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 3.0 8b Instruct and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.