# Granite 3.0 8b Instruct vs Grok 4.7

> Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 31.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/granite-3-0-8b-instruct-vs-grok-4-7
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.0 8b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.7 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.7 leads 70.1 to 31.2.
- Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 3.0 8b Instruct | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 31.1 | 46.6 |
| Rank | 266 | 56 |
| Context | — | 500K |
| Input $/M | — | $2 |
| Output $/M | — | $6 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.1 (#297)
- Grok 4.7: 55.0 (#23)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 8b Instruct | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1113 | 1423 |
| CursorBench | — | 46.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1636 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 29.5% |
| SciCode | — | 57.4% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29.3% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 35.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 20.0 (#227)
- Grok 4.7: 40.1 (#49)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 8b Instruct | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1092 | 1409 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 76.8% |
| CritPt | — | 17.7% |

## Math

- Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 30.3 (#211)
- Grok 4.7: 41.1 (#73)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 8b Instruct | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1143 | 1393 |
| ProofBench | — | 34% |

## Knowledge

- Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.1 (#233)
- Grok 4.7: 38.7 (#130)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 8b Instruct | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1087 | 1413 |

## Multimodal

- Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: —
- Grok 4.7: 28.8 (#107)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 8b Instruct | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | — | 20.8% |

## Multilingual

- Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 27.4 (#271)
- Grok 4.7: 51.2 (#108)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 8b Instruct | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1037 | 1392 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1063 | 1476 |
| LMArena Russian | 1060 | 1396 |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 56.2 (#271)
- Grok 4.7: 74.3 (#98)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 8b Instruct | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1088 | 1406 |

## Long Context

- Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 34.0 (#247)
- Grok 4.7: 43.2 (#97)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 8b Instruct | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1122 | 1416 |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 31.2 (#280)
- Grok 4.7: 70.1 (#23)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 8b Instruct | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1096 | 1397 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1071 | 1391 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1063 | 1389 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 2007 |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 3.0 8b Instruct better than Grok 4.7?

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 31.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Granite 3.0 8b Instruct or Grok 4.7 better for coding?

Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.0 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 3.0 8b Instruct and Grok 4.7 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.7 has 21.