# Granite 3.0 2b Instruct vs Qwen1.5-7B

> Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Qwen1.5-7B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.8 vs 31.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/granite-3-0-2b-instruct-vs-qwen1-5-7b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.0 2b Instruct scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen1.5-7B in 4 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen1.5-7B leads 32.2 to 28.3.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 31.4 |
| Rank | 286 | 273 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 28.3 (#316)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 32.2 (#276)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1090 | 1107 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 20.5% | — |

## Reasoning

- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 20.5 (#235)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 20.4 (#240)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1073 | 1065 |

## Math

- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.2 (#217)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 31.4 (#224)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1117 | 1080 |

## Knowledge

- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.0 (#241)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 28.7 (#243)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1064 | 1055 |
| MMLU | — | 62.6% |

## Multilingual

- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.0 (#278)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 28.5 (#271)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1033 | 1058 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1070 | 1141 |
| LMArena Russian | 1045 | 1006 |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 53.9 (#284)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 54.1 (#281)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1056 | 1058 |

## Long Context

- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.5 (#268)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 33.1 (#266)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1070 | 1090 |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.6 (#292)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 29.6 (#293)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1080 | 1083 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1046 | 1035 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1053 | 1062 |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 3.0 2b Instruct better than Qwen1.5-7B?

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Qwen1.5-7B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.8 vs 31.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Granite 3.0 2b Instruct or Qwen1.5-7B better for coding?

Qwen1.5-7B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.2 versus 28.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Qwen1.5-7B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-7B has 13.