# Granite 3.0 2b Instruct vs Qwen-14B

> Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Qwen-14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.2 vs 30.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/granite-3-0-2b-instruct-vs-qwen-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.0 2b Instruct scores higher in 5 categories and Qwen-14B in 2 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.2 | 30.8 |
| Rank | 284 | 273 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.8 (#311)
- Qwen-14B: 30.6 (#283)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1090 | 1072 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 20.5% | — |

## Reasoning

- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 19.6 (#234)
- Qwen-14B: 18.7 (#255)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1073 | 1027 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 112.8 |
| LAMBADA | — | 71.1% |
| PIQA | — | 79.9% |

## Math

- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.7 (#215)
- Qwen-14B: 28.7 (#224)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1117 | 1068 |
| GSM8K | — | 61.3% |

## Knowledge

- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 28.4 (#238)
- Qwen-14B: —

| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1064 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 84.4% |
| BoolQ | — | 86.2% |
| MMLU | — | 66.3% |

## Multilingual

- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.1 (#273)
- Qwen-14B: 27.7 (#270)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1033 | 1042 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1070 | 1077 |
| LMArena Russian | 1045 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 54.2 (#279)
- Qwen-14B: 52.6 (#284)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1056 | 1031 |

## Long Context

- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.5 (#263)
- Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#276)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1071 | 1029 |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.8 (#287)
- Qwen-14B: 27.8 (#294)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1080 | 1051 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1046 | 1028 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1053 | 1022 |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 3.0 2b Instruct better than Qwen-14B?

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Qwen-14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.2 vs 30.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Granite 3.0 2b Instruct or Qwen-14B better for coding?

Qwen-14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.6 versus 27.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Qwen-14B share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-14B has 18.