# Granite 3.0 2b Instruct vs Muse Glimmer

> Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/granite-3-0-2b-instruct-vs-muse-glimmer
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.0 2b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Glimmer in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Glimmer leads 57.5 to 29.6.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 41.7 |
| Rank | 286 | 131 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 28.3 (#316)
- Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1090 | 1416 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1355 |
| SciCode | — | 44.9% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 20.5% | — |

## Reasoning

- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 20.5 (#235)
- Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1073 | 1396 |
| CritPt | — | 2.6% |

## Math

- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.2 (#217)
- Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1117 | 1417 |

## Knowledge

- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.0 (#241)
- Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1064 | 1386 |

## Multilingual

- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.0 (#278)
- Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1033 | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1070 | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | 1045 | 1390 |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 53.9 (#284)
- Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1056 | 1375 |

## Long Context

- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.5 (#268)
- Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1070 | 1382 |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.6 (#292)
- Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1080 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1046 | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1053 | 1399 |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 3.0 2b Instruct better than Muse Glimmer?

Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Granite 3.0 2b Instruct or Muse Glimmer better for coding?

Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 28.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Muse Glimmer share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has 13 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 15.