# Granite 3.0 2b Instruct vs Mistral 7B

> Granite 3.0 2b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.2 to 22.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/granite-3-0-2b-instruct-vs-mistral-7b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.0 2b Instruct scores higher in 6 categories and Mistral 7B in 2 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads 29.7 to 7.6.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 30.2 | 22.9 |
| Rank | 284 | 346 |
| Context | — | 8K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.25 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.25 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.8 (#311)
- Mistral 7B: 25.9 (#321)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 20.5% | 19.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1090 | 1082 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 27.3% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 36% |
| MBPP+ | — | 42.1% |

## Reasoning

- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 19.6 (#234)
- Mistral 7B: 12.6 (#331)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1073 | 1067 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| DTBench | — | 42.5% |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 47.1% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 56.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 111.97 |
| HellaSwag | — | 81% |
| PIQA | — | 83% |
| WinoGrande | — | 75.3% |

## Math

- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.7 (#215)
- Mistral 7B: 7.6 (#319)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1117 | 1085 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 0.3% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 3.7% |
| GSM8K | — | 54.4% |

## Knowledge

- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 28.4 (#238)
- Mistral 7B: 7.3 (#306)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1064 | 1036 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 15.2% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 78.6% |
| BoolQ | — | 87.4% |
| MMLU | — | 62.5% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 79.8% |
| TriviaQA | — | 75.2% |

## Multilingual

- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.1 (#273)
- Mistral 7B: 26.0 (#278)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1033 | 1012 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1070 | 1009 |
| LMArena Russian | 1045 | 1018 |
| LMArena French | — | 1036 |
| LMArena German | — | 987 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 878 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1026 |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 54.2 (#279)
- Mistral 7B: 54.5 (#275)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1056 | 1060 |

## Long Context

- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.5 (#263)
- Mistral 7B: 32.2 (#266)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1071 | 1060 |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.8 (#287)
- Mistral 7B: 30.9 (#281)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1080 | 1090 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1046 | 1068 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1053 | 1062 |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 3.0 2b Instruct better than Mistral 7B?

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.2 to 22.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Granite 3.0 2b Instruct or Mistral 7B better for coding?

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 27.8 versus 25.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Mistral 7B share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has 13 scored results on Noometry and Mistral 7B has 37.