# Granite 3.0 2b Instruct vs Llama 3-70B

> Granite 3.0 2b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/granite-3-0-2b-instruct-vs-llama-3-70b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.0 2b Instruct scores higher in 3 categories and Llama 3-70B in 5 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads 32.2 to 12.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Instruct: 20.5% for Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and 43.6% for Llama 3-70B.

## Snapshot

| | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 28.8 |
| Rank | 286 | 323 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 28.3 (#316)
- Llama 3-70B: 35.8 (#218)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 20.5% | 43.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1090 | 1206 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54.5% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 72% |
| MBPP+ | — | 69% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: —
- Llama 3-70B: 21.1 (#139)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 5% |

## Reasoning

- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 20.5 (#235)
- Llama 3-70B: 18.0 (#288)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1073 | 1195 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 35.1% |
| DTBench | — | 54.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 122.93 |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.1 |
| WinoGrande | — | 83.5% |

## Math

- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.2 (#217)
- Llama 3-70B: 12.8 (#305)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1117 | 1218 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 4.3% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 22.6% |

## Knowledge

- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.0 (#241)
- Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#277)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1064 | 1149 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 40.6% |
| MMLU | — | 79.3% |

## Multilingual

- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.0 (#278)
- Llama 3-70B: 33.6 (#251)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1033 | 1142 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1070 | 1114 |
| LMArena Russian | 1045 | 1159 |
| LMArena French | — | 1232 |
| LMArena German | — | 1169 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1017 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1017 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1241 |

## Instruction Following

- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 53.9 (#284)
- Llama 3-70B: 62.5 (#238)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1056 | 1194 |

## Long Context

- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.5 (#268)
- Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#240)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1070 | 1174 |

## Writing & Preference

- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.6 (#292)
- Llama 3-70B: 42.8 (#231)

| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1080 | 1221 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1046 | 1210 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1053 | 1223 |

## FAQ

### Is Granite 3.0 2b Instruct better than Llama 3-70B?

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Granite 3.0 2b Instruct or Llama 3-70B better for coding?

Llama 3-70B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.8 versus 28.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Llama 3-70B share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has 13 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3-70B has 31.