# gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3 32B

> Qwen3 32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index. gpt-oss-20b costs 34× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3 32B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-oss-20b-vs-qwen3-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 22

## Summary

- They share 22 benchmarks with published results for both. gpt-oss-20b scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3 32B in 9 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where Qwen3 32B leads 32.6 to 9.3.
- gpt-oss-20b is cheaper at $0.018 / $0.09 per million input/output tokens, against $0.70 / $2.80 for Qwen3 32B.

## Snapshot

| | gpt-oss-20b | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.5 | 39.2 |
| Rank | 255 | 172 |
| Context | 131K | 131K |
| Input $/M | $0.018 | $0.70 |
| Output $/M | $0.09 | $2.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- gpt-oss-20b: 37.6 (#192)
- Qwen3 32B: 37.7 (#190)

| Benchmark | gpt-oss-20b | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 34.4% | 35.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1306 | 1358 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 40% |
| WeirdML | 40.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 566.05 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- gpt-oss-20b: 9.3 (#154)
- Qwen3 32B: 32.6 (#62)

| Benchmark | gpt-oss-20b | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 3.4% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 48.7% |

## Reasoning

- gpt-oss-20b: 19.3 (#261)
- Qwen3 32B: 20.2 (#241)

| Benchmark | gpt-oss-20b | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 53.2% | 54.9% |
| CritPt | 1.4% | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | 4% | 5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1274 | 1334 |
| DTBench | 68% | 67.5% |
| LMCA | 14.5% | 17.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 137.82 | 138.51 |

## Math

- gpt-oss-20b: 39.4 (#103)
- Qwen3 32B: 39.7 (#99)

| Benchmark | gpt-oss-20b | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 65.3% | 66.9% |
| LMArena Math | 1317 | 1399 |
| Omni-MATH | 56.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- gpt-oss-20b: 34.6 (#195)
- Qwen3 32B: 40.0 (#125)

| Benchmark | gpt-oss-20b | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 60.8% | 65.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1258 | 1362 |
| MMLU-Pro | 74% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.9% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 59.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- gpt-oss-20b: 42.2 (#197)
- Qwen3 32B: 45.6 (#167)

| Benchmark | gpt-oss-20b | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1268 | 1317 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1314 | 1357 |
| LMArena German | 1255 | 1341 |
| LMArena Russian | 1278 | 1311 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1244 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1236 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1267 | — |

## Instruction Following

- gpt-oss-20b: 61.8 (#240)
- Qwen3 32B: 68.9 (#179)

| Benchmark | gpt-oss-20b | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1236 | 1305 |
| IFEval | 73.2% | — |

## Long Context

- gpt-oss-20b: 37.9 (#209)
- Qwen3 32B: 43.8 (#87)

| Benchmark | gpt-oss-20b | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1250 | 1327 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 74.2% |

## Writing & Preference

- gpt-oss-20b: 35.5 (#265)
- Qwen3 32B: 52.9 (#163)

| Benchmark | gpt-oss-20b | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1287 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1201 | 1297 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1268 | 1331 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 666 | — |
| WildBench | 73.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is gpt-oss-20b better than Qwen3 32B?

Qwen3 32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index. gpt-oss-20b costs 34× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3 32B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, gpt-oss-20b or Qwen3 32B?

gpt-oss-20b is cheaper. It lists at $0.018 per million input tokens and $0.09 per million output tokens; Qwen3 32B lists at $0.70 and $2.80.

### Is gpt-oss-20b or Qwen3 32B better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (37.6 vs 37.7); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 131K tokens.

### How many benchmarks do gpt-oss-20b and Qwen3 32B share?

22 benchmarks have published results for both models. gpt-oss-20b has 34 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 32B has 26.