# gpt-oss-20b vs Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10

> Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-oss-20b-vs-hunyuan-large
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. gpt-oss-20b scores higher in 2 categories and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 in 6 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads 48.7 to 35.5.
- gpt-oss-20b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | gpt-oss-20b | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 32.5 | 38.6 |
| Rank | 255 | 184 |
| Context | 131K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.018 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.09 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- gpt-oss-20b: 37.6 (#192)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 38.2 (#181)

| Benchmark | gpt-oss-20b | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1306 | 1307 |
| SciCode | 34.4% | — |
| WeirdML | 40.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 566.05 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- gpt-oss-20b: 9.3 (#154)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —

| Benchmark | gpt-oss-20b | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 3.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- gpt-oss-20b: 19.3 (#261)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 25.5 (#148)

| Benchmark | gpt-oss-20b | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1274 | 1286 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 53.2% | — |
| CritPt | 1.4% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 4% | — |
| DTBench | 68% | — |
| LMCA | 14.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 137.82 | — |

## Math

- gpt-oss-20b: 39.4 (#103)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.8 (#178)

| Benchmark | gpt-oss-20b | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1317 | 1281 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 65.3% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 56.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- gpt-oss-20b: 34.6 (#195)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.1 (#188)

| Benchmark | gpt-oss-20b | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1258 | 1276 |
| GPQA Diamond | 60.8% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 74% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 59.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- gpt-oss-20b: 42.2 (#197)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.0 (#200)

| Benchmark | gpt-oss-20b | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1268 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1314 | 1346 |
| LMArena Russian | 1278 | 1266 |
| LMArena German | 1255 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1244 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1236 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1267 | — |

## Instruction Following

- gpt-oss-20b: 61.8 (#240)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.3 (#197)

| Benchmark | gpt-oss-20b | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1236 | 1277 |
| IFEval | 73.2% | — |

## Long Context

- gpt-oss-20b: 37.9 (#209)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#149)

| Benchmark | gpt-oss-20b | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1250 | 1341 |

## Writing & Preference

- gpt-oss-20b: 35.5 (#265)
- Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.7 (#197)

| Benchmark | gpt-oss-20b | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1287 | 1288 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1201 | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1268 | 1284 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 666 | — |
| WildBench | 73.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is gpt-oss-20b better than Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10?

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is gpt-oss-20b or Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (37.6 vs 38.2); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do gpt-oss-20b and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. gpt-oss-20b has 34 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12.