# GPT-6 Sol vs Qwen3.7 Plus

> GPT-6 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.2 to 45.0 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Plus costs 5.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-6 Sol's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-6-sol-vs-qwen3-7-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 15

## Summary

- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-6 Sol scores higher in 5 categories and Qwen3.7 Plus in 5 categories; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where GPT-6 Sol leads 59.6 to 36.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is FrontierCode: 49.3% for GPT-6 Sol and 10.2% for Qwen3.7 Plus.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $1.60 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $10 for GPT-6 Sol.
- GPT-6 Sol accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.

## Snapshot

| | GPT-6 Sol | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 49.2 | 45.0 |
| Rank | 46 | 66 |
| Context | 1.05M | 1M |
| Input $/M | $2 | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | $10 | $1.60 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- GPT-6 Sol: 59.6 (#11)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.1 (#200)

| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierCode | 49.3% | 10.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1453 | 1473 |
| DeepSWE | 68.8% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1692 | — |
| SciCode | — | 45.5% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GPT-6 Sol: 33.5 (#49)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.2 (#130)

| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 2.8% |
| GDP.pdf | 28% | — |

## Reasoning

- GPT-6 Sol: 49.3 (#34)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 38.4 (#54)

| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 90.1% | 74.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1420 | 1460 |
| CritPt | — | 9.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 24% |
| EBR-Bench | 53.3% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 84% |
| LMCA | — | 37.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 147.39 |

## Math

- GPT-6 Sol: 35.8 (#135)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 49.3 (#47)

| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1404 | 1467 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 34.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 93.3% |

## Knowledge

- GPT-6 Sol: 43.0 (#87)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#46)

| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1449 | 1467 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87.9% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.5% | — |

## Multimodal

- GPT-6 Sol: 47.6 (#9)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.2 (#30)

| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1281 |
| Furniture Assembly | 58.3% | — |
| LMArena Document | — | 1444 |

## Multilingual

- GPT-6 Sol: 51.0 (#113)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 55.0 (#36)

| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1389 | 1445 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1416 | 1510 |
| LMArena Russian | 1407 | 1457 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1377 | 1453 |
| LMArena French | — | 1471 |
| LMArena German | — | 1471 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1411 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1416 |

## Instruction Following

- GPT-6 Sol: 74.4 (#97)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.9 (#49)

| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1406 | 1439 |

## Long Context

- GPT-6 Sol: 43.2 (#100)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#61)

| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1415 | 1454 |

## Writing & Preference

- GPT-6 Sol: 72.3 (#15)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.5 (#54)

| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1396 | 1454 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | 1439 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1405 | 1459 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2125 | — |

## FAQ

### Is GPT-6 Sol better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

GPT-6 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.2 to 45.0 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Plus costs 5.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-6 Sol's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, GPT-6 Sol or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.60 per million output tokens; GPT-6 Sol lists at $2 and $10.

### Is GPT-6 Sol or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

GPT-6 Sol scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.6 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-6 Sol does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

### How many benchmarks do GPT-6 Sol and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-6 Sol has 22 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.