# GPT-6 Sol vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct

> GPT-6 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.2 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-6-sol-vs-olmo-3-1-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-6 Sol scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-6 Sol leads 49.3 to 25.4.
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GPT-6 Sol | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 49.2 | 38.8 |
| Rank | 46 | 168 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $2 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- GPT-6 Sol: 59.6 (#11)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 38.9 (#154)

| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1453 | 1346 |
| DeepSWE | 68.8% | — |
| FrontierCode | 49.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1692 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GPT-6 Sol: 33.5 (#49)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: —

| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | 28% | — |

## Reasoning

- GPT-6 Sol: 49.3 (#34)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 25.4 (#131)

| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1420 | 1322 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 90.1% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 53.3% | — |

## Math

- GPT-6 Sol: 35.8 (#135)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 33.6 (#169)

| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1404 | 1305 |

## Knowledge

- GPT-6 Sol: 43.0 (#87)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 35.4 (#175)

| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1449 | 1307 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.5% | — |

## Multimodal

- GPT-6 Sol: 47.6 (#9)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: —

| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | 58.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- GPT-6 Sol: 51.0 (#113)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.8 (#185)

| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1389 | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1416 | 1304 |
| LMArena Russian | 1407 | 1268 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1377 | 1337 |
| LMArena French | — | 1328 |
| LMArena German | — | 1283 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1206 |

## Instruction Following

- GPT-6 Sol: 74.4 (#97)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.8 (#182)

| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1406 | 1298 |

## Long Context

- GPT-6 Sol: 43.2 (#100)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#161)

| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1415 | 1312 |

## Writing & Preference

- GPT-6 Sol: 72.3 (#15)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.4 (#179)

| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1396 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1405 | 1309 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2125 | — |

## FAQ

### Is GPT-6 Sol better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?

GPT-6 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.2 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is GPT-6 Sol or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?

GPT-6 Sol scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.6 versus 38.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do GPT-6 Sol and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-6 Sol has 22 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.