# GPT-6 Sol vs Grok 4.1

> GPT-6 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.2 to 40.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-6-sol-vs-grok-4-1
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-6 Sol scores higher in 5 categories and Grok 4.1 in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where GPT-6 Sol leads 59.6 to 33.4.

## Snapshot

| | GPT-6 Sol | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 49.2 | 40.8 |
| Rank | 46 | 135 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $2 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- GPT-6 Sol: 59.6 (#11)
- Grok 4.1: 33.4 (#246)

| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1692 | 1214 |
| LMArena Coding | 1453 | 1445 |
| DeepSWE | 68.8% | — |
| FrontierCode | 49.3% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GPT-6 Sol: 33.5 (#49)
- Grok 4.1: 33.8 (#47)

| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 39% |
| GDP.pdf | 28% | — |

## Reasoning

- GPT-6 Sol: 49.3 (#34)
- Grok 4.1: 28.3 (#91)

| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1420 | 1436 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 90.1% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 53.3% | — |

## Math

- GPT-6 Sol: 35.8 (#135)
- Grok 4.1: 36.2 (#124)

| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1404 | 1422 |

## Knowledge

- GPT-6 Sol: 43.0 (#87)
- Grok 4.1: 38.9 (#129)

| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1449 | 1417 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.5% | — |

## Multimodal

- GPT-6 Sol: 47.6 (#9)
- Grok 4.1: —

| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | 58.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- GPT-6 Sol: 51.0 (#113)
- Grok 4.1: 53.6 (#64)

| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1389 | 1425 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1416 | 1464 |
| LMArena Russian | 1407 | 1434 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1377 | 1438 |
| LMArena French | — | 1448 |
| LMArena German | — | 1447 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1396 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1407 |

## Instruction Following

- GPT-6 Sol: 74.4 (#97)
- Grok 4.1: 74.0 (#106)

| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1406 | 1400 |

## Long Context

- GPT-6 Sol: 43.2 (#100)
- Grok 4.1: 43.2 (#96)

| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1415 | 1416 |

## Writing & Preference

- GPT-6 Sol: 72.3 (#15)
- Grok 4.1: 62.6 (#71)

| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1396 | 1437 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | 1411 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1405 | 1438 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2125 | — |

## FAQ

### Is GPT-6 Sol better than Grok 4.1?

GPT-6 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.2 to 40.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is GPT-6 Sol or Grok 4.1 better for coding?

GPT-6 Sol scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.6 versus 33.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do GPT-6 Sol and Grok 4.1 share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-6 Sol has 22 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.1 has 19.