# GPT-6.1 Sol vs Qwen3.8 Flash

> GPT-6.1 Sol has enough public results to be ranked (#6); Qwen3.8 Flash does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-vs-qwen3-8-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. GPT-6.1 Sol scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.8 Flash in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where GPT-6.1 Sol leads 39.6 to 31.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GDP.pdf: 32% for GPT-6.1 Sol and 16.6% for Qwen3.8 Flash.
- Qwen3.8 Flash is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.47 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $10 for GPT-6.1 Sol.
- GPT-6.1 Sol accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.

## Snapshot

| | GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 65.6 | 35.5 |
| Rank | 6 | — |
| Context | 1.05M | 1M |
| Input $/M | $2 | $0.15 |
| Output $/M | $10 | $0.47 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- GPT-6.1 Sol: 63.2 (#8)
- Qwen3.8 Flash: —

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | 75.2% | — |
| FrontierCode | 50.2% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1755 | — |
| SciCode | 55.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1487 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GPT-6.1 Sol: 39.6 (#26)
- Qwen3.8 Flash: 31.3

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | 32% | 16.6% |
| APEX-Agents | 60% | — |

## Reasoning

- GPT-6.1 Sol: 81.9 (#2)
- Qwen3.8 Flash: —

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 94.2% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 95.5% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 98.5% | — |
| CritPt | 31.7% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 61% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 54.3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1466 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 80% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 166.09 | — |

## Math

- GPT-6.1 Sol: 93.7 (#1)
- Qwen3.8 Flash: —

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 93.7% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 100% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 100% | — |
| ProofBench | 99% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1464 | — |

## Knowledge

- GPT-6.1 Sol: 71.8 (#4)
- Qwen3.8 Flash: —

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 95.4% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 73.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1502 | — |

## Multimodal

- GPT-6.1 Sol: 52.7 (#5)
- Qwen3.8 Flash: —

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1288 | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 80% | — |

## Multilingual

- GPT-6.1 Sol: 54.3 (#46)
- Qwen3.8 Flash: —

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1438 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1477 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1455 | — |

## Instruction Following

- GPT-6.1 Sol: 77.0 (#29)
- Qwen3.8 Flash: —

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1468 | — |

## Long Context

- GPT-6.1 Sol: 44.9 (#54)
- Qwen3.8 Flash: —

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1465 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- GPT-6.1 Sol: 63.6 (#63)
- Qwen3.8 Flash: —

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1447 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1432 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1449 | — |

## FAQ

### Is GPT-6.1 Sol better than Qwen3.8 Flash?

GPT-6.1 Sol has enough public results to be ranked (#6); Qwen3.8 Flash does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### Which is cheaper, GPT-6.1 Sol or Qwen3.8 Flash?

Qwen3.8 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.47 per million output tokens; GPT-6.1 Sol lists at $2 and $10.

### Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-6.1 Sol does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

### How many benchmarks do GPT-6.1 Sol and Qwen3.8 Flash share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. GPT-6.1 Sol has 34 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.8 Flash has 1.