# GPT-6.1 Sol vs Qwen2.5-Max

> GPT-6.1 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 65.6 to 40.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-vs-qwen2-5-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-6.1 Sol scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen2.5-Max in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-6.1 Sol leads 93.7 to 36.9.

## Snapshot

| | GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 65.6 | 40.7 |
| Rank | 6 | 146 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $2 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- GPT-6.1 Sol: 63.2 (#8)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 41.8 (#117)

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1487 | 1359 |
| DeepSWE | 75.2% | — |
| FrontierCode | 50.2% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1755 | — |
| SciCode | 55.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 64.4% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GPT-6.1 Sol: 39.6 (#26)
- Qwen2.5-Max: —

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 60% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 32% | — |

## Reasoning

- GPT-6.1 Sol: 81.9 (#2)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 25.6 (#147)

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1466 | 1360 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 166.09 | 132.53 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 94.2% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 95.5% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 98.5% | — |
| CritPt | 31.7% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 61% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 54.3% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 51.4% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 80% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 67.9% |
| LiveBench | — | 62.3% |

## Math

- GPT-6.1 Sol: 93.7 (#1)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 36.9 (#162)

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1464 | 1369 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 93.7% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 100% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 100% | — |
| ProofBench | 99% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 58.4% |

## Knowledge

- GPT-6.1 Sol: 71.8 (#4)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 35.3 (#186)

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1502 | 1337 |
| GPQA Diamond | 95.4% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 73.9% | — |
| Confabulations | — | 21.8% |

## Multimodal

- GPT-6.1 Sol: 52.7 (#5)
- Qwen2.5-Max: —

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1288 | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 80% | — |

## Multilingual

- GPT-6.1 Sol: 54.3 (#46)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 48.1 (#146)

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1438 | 1352 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1477 | 1382 |
| LMArena Russian | 1455 | 1353 |
| LMArena French | — | 1396 |
| LMArena German | — | 1350 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1300 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1304 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1377 |

## Instruction Following

- GPT-6.1 Sol: 77.0 (#29)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 71.3 (#152)

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1468 | 1335 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 75.3% |

## Long Context

- GPT-6.1 Sol: 44.9 (#54)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 41.4 (#142)

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1465 | 1358 |

## Writing & Preference

- GPT-6.1 Sol: 63.6 (#63)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 55.4 (#146)

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1447 | 1367 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1432 | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1449 | 1364 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 72.9% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 56.3% |

## FAQ

### Is GPT-6.1 Sol better than Qwen2.5-Max?

GPT-6.1 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 65.6 to 40.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is GPT-6.1 Sol or Qwen2.5-Max better for coding?

GPT-6.1 Sol scores higher on coding benchmarks: 63.2 versus 41.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do GPT-6.1 Sol and Qwen2.5-Max share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-6.1 Sol has 34 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Max has 27.