# GPT-6.1 Sol vs Qwen Plus

> Qwen Plus has enough public results to be ranked (#204); GPT-6.1 Sol does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-vs-qwen-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in coding, where GPT-6.1 Sol leads 51.4 to 38.3.
- Qwen Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $10 for GPT-6.1 Sol.
- GPT-6.1 Sol accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.

## Snapshot

| | GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 42.1 | 36.7 |
| Rank | — | 204 |
| Context | 1.05M | 1M |
| Input $/M | $2 | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | $10 | $1.20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- GPT-6.1 Sol: 51.4
- Qwen Plus: 38.3 (#163)

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | 75.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1328 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GPT-6.1 Sol: 34.3
- Qwen Plus: —

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | 32% | — |

## Reasoning

- GPT-6.1 Sol: —
- Qwen Plus: 27.6 (#101)

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 63.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1317 |
| DTBench | — | 81.1% |
| LMCA | — | 24% |

## Math

- GPT-6.1 Sol: —
- Qwen Plus: 22.0 (#266)

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 17.8% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1326 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 65.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |

## Knowledge

- GPT-6.1 Sol: —
- Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#245)

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 48.1% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1328 |

## Multilingual

- GPT-6.1 Sol: —
- Qwen Plus: 45.3 (#170)

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1347 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1251 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1323 |

## Instruction Following

- GPT-6.1 Sol: —
- Qwen Plus: 69.0 (#176)

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1303 |

## Long Context

- GPT-6.1 Sol: —
- Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#153)

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1325 |

## Writing & Preference

- GPT-6.1 Sol: —
- Qwen Plus: 52.4 (#171)

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1293 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1336 |

## FAQ

### Is GPT-6.1 Sol better than Qwen Plus?

Qwen Plus has enough public results to be ranked (#204); GPT-6.1 Sol does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### Which is cheaper, GPT-6.1 Sol or Qwen Plus?

Qwen Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; GPT-6.1 Sol lists at $2 and $10.

### Is GPT-6.1 Sol or Qwen Plus better for coding?

GPT-6.1 Sol scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.4 versus 38.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-6.1 Sol does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

### How many benchmarks do GPT-6.1 Sol and Qwen Plus share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-6.1 Sol has 2 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.