# GPT-6.1 Sol vs Qwen Max

> GPT-6.1 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 65.6 to 34.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-vs-qwen-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-6.1 Sol scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen Max in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-6.1 Sol leads 93.7 to 22.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 100% for GPT-6.1 Sol and 16.1% for Qwen Max.
- Qwen Max is cheaper at $1.60 / $6.40 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $10 for GPT-6.1 Sol.
- GPT-6.1 Sol accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 33K.

## Snapshot

| | GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 65.6 | 34.7 |
| Rank | 6 | 230 |
| Context | 1.05M | 33K |
| Input $/M | $2 | $1.60 |
| Output $/M | $10 | $6.40 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- GPT-6.1 Sol: 63.2 (#8)
- Qwen Max: 30.7 (#292)

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1487 | 1288 |
| DeepSWE | 75.2% | — |
| FrontierCode | 50.2% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 21.8% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1755 | — |
| SciCode | 55.8% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GPT-6.1 Sol: 39.6 (#26)
- Qwen Max: —

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 60% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 32% | — |

## Reasoning

- GPT-6.1 Sol: 81.9 (#2)
- Qwen Max: 25.1 (#151)

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1466 | 1269 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 94.2% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 95.5% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 98.5% | — |
| CritPt | 31.7% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 61% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 54.3% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 80% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 166.09 | — |

## Math

- GPT-6.1 Sol: 93.7 (#1)
- Qwen Max: 22.3 (#276)

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 100% | 16.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1464 | 1275 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 93.7% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 100% | — |
| ProofBench | 99% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 67.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1% |

## Knowledge

- GPT-6.1 Sol: 71.8 (#4)
- Qwen Max: 30.3 (#228)

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 95.4% | 56.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1502 | 1248 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 73.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- GPT-6.1 Sol: 52.7 (#5)
- Qwen Max: —

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1288 | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 80% | — |

## Multilingual

- GPT-6.1 Sol: 54.3 (#46)
- Qwen Max: 41.8 (#202)

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1438 | 1263 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1477 | 1254 |
| LMArena Russian | 1455 | 1274 |
| LMArena French | — | 1330 |
| LMArena German | — | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1205 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1142 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1290 |

## Instruction Following

- GPT-6.1 Sol: 77.0 (#29)
- Qwen Max: 66.5 (#208)

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1468 | 1262 |

## Long Context

- GPT-6.1 Sol: 44.9 (#54)
- Qwen Max: 39.4 (#180)

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1465 | 1288 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |

## Writing & Preference

- GPT-6.1 Sol: 63.6 (#63)
- Qwen Max: 47.8 (#205)

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1447 | 1282 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1432 | 1248 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1449 | 1277 |

## FAQ

### Is GPT-6.1 Sol better than Qwen Max?

GPT-6.1 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 65.6 to 34.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, GPT-6.1 Sol or Qwen Max?

Qwen Max is cheaper. It lists at $1.60 per million input tokens and $6.40 per million output tokens; GPT-6.1 Sol lists at $2 and $10.

### Is GPT-6.1 Sol or Qwen Max better for coding?

GPT-6.1 Sol scores higher on coding benchmarks: 63.2 versus 30.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-6.1 Sol does, with 1.05M tokens against 33K.

### How many benchmarks do GPT-6.1 Sol and Qwen Max share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-6.1 Sol has 34 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Max has 23.