# GPT-6.1 Sol vs Qwen-14B

> GPT-6.1 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 65.6 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-vs-qwen-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-6.1 Sol scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen-14B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-6.1 Sol leads 93.7 to 31.2.
- Qwen-14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 65.6 | 31.4 |
| Rank | 6 | 275 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $2 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- GPT-6.1 Sol: 63.2 (#8)
- Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#288)

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1487 | 1071 |
| DeepSWE | 75.2% | — |
| FrontierCode | 50.2% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1755 | — |
| SciCode | 55.8% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GPT-6.1 Sol: 39.6 (#26)
- Qwen-14B: —

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 60% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 32% | — |

## Reasoning

- GPT-6.1 Sol: 81.9 (#2)
- Qwen-14B: 19.6 (#257)

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1466 | 1027 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 166.09 | 113.03 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 94.2% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 95.5% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 98.5% | — |
| CritPt | 31.7% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 61% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 54.3% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 80% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55% |
| LAMBADA | — | 71.1% |
| PIQA | — | 79.9% |

## Math

- GPT-6.1 Sol: 93.7 (#1)
- Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#227)

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1464 | 1068 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 93.7% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 100% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 100% | — |
| ProofBench | 99% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 61.3% |

## Knowledge

- GPT-6.1 Sol: 71.8 (#4)
- Qwen-14B: —

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 95.4% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 73.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1502 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 84.4% |
| BoolQ | — | 86.2% |
| MMLU | — | 66.3% |

## Multimodal

- GPT-6.1 Sol: 52.7 (#5)
- Qwen-14B: —

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1288 | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 80% | — |

## Multilingual

- GPT-6.1 Sol: 54.3 (#46)
- Qwen-14B: 27.5 (#275)

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1438 | 1041 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1477 | 1077 |
| LMArena Russian | 1455 | — |

## Instruction Following

- GPT-6.1 Sol: 77.0 (#29)
- Qwen-14B: 52.4 (#289)

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1468 | 1031 |

## Long Context

- GPT-6.1 Sol: 44.9 (#54)
- Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#280)

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1465 | 1028 |

## Writing & Preference

- GPT-6.1 Sol: 63.6 (#63)
- Qwen-14B: 27.6 (#299)

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1447 | 1051 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1432 | 1028 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1449 | 1022 |

## FAQ

### Is GPT-6.1 Sol better than Qwen-14B?

GPT-6.1 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 65.6 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is GPT-6.1 Sol or Qwen-14B better for coding?

GPT-6.1 Sol scores higher on coding benchmarks: 63.2 versus 31.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do GPT-6.1 Sol and Qwen-14B share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-6.1 Sol has 34 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-14B has 18.