# GPT-6.1 Sol vs Phi-3.5-mini

> Neither GPT-6.1 Sol nor Phi-3.5-mini has enough public benchmark results to be ranked yet; the rows below show what has been published.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-vs-phi-3-5-mini
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in coding, where GPT-6.1 Sol leads 51.4 to 34.0.
- Phi-3.5-mini has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GPT-6.1 Sol | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 42.1 | 36.4 |
| Rank | — | — |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $2 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- GPT-6.1 Sol: 51.4
- Phi-3.5-mini: 34.0 (#231)

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | 75.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 32.8% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 38.5% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GPT-6.1 Sol: 34.3
- Phi-3.5-mini: —

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | 32% | — |

## Reasoning

- GPT-6.1 Sol: —
- Phi-3.5-mini: —

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| PIQA | — | 81% |

## Math

- GPT-6.1 Sol: —
- Phi-3.5-mini: —

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| GSM8K | — | 86.2% |

## Knowledge

- GPT-6.1 Sol: —
- Phi-3.5-mini: —

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| BoolQ | — | 78% |

## FAQ

### Is GPT-6.1 Sol better than Phi-3.5-mini?

Neither GPT-6.1 Sol nor Phi-3.5-mini has enough public benchmark results to be ranked yet; the rows below show what has been published.

### Is GPT-6.1 Sol or Phi-3.5-mini better for coding?

GPT-6.1 Sol scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.4 versus 34.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do GPT-6.1 Sol and Phi-3.5-mini share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-6.1 Sol has 2 scored results on Noometry and Phi-3.5-mini has 5.