# GPT-6.1 Sol vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think

> GPT-6.1 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 65.6 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-vs-olmo-3-1-32b-think
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-6.1 Sol scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Think in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-6.1 Sol leads 93.7 to 36.3.
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GPT-6.1 Sol | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 65.6 | 37.9 |
| Rank | 6 | 191 |
| Context | 1.05M | — |
| Input $/M | $2 | — |
| Output $/M | $10 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- GPT-6.1 Sol: 63.2 (#8)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.7 (#189)

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1487 | 1291 |
| DeepSWE | 75.2% | — |
| FrontierCode | 50.2% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1755 | — |
| SciCode | 55.8% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GPT-6.1 Sol: 39.6 (#26)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: —

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 60% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 32% | — |

## Reasoning

- GPT-6.1 Sol: 81.9 (#2)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 25.2 (#150)

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1466 | 1272 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 94.2% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 95.5% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 98.5% | — |
| CritPt | 31.7% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 61% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 54.3% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 80% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 166.09 | — |

## Math

- GPT-6.1 Sol: 93.7 (#1)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 36.3 (#168)

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1464 | 1305 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 93.7% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 100% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 100% | — |
| ProofBench | 99% | — |

## Knowledge

- GPT-6.1 Sol: 71.8 (#4)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.7 (#181)

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1502 | 1295 |
| GPQA Diamond | 95.4% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 73.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- GPT-6.1 Sol: 52.7 (#5)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: —

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1288 | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 80% | — |

## Multilingual

- GPT-6.1 Sol: 54.3 (#46)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.1 (#231)

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1438 | 1209 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1477 | 1242 |
| LMArena Russian | 1455 | 1193 |
| LMArena French | — | 1260 |
| LMArena German | — | 1262 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1289 |

## Instruction Following

- GPT-6.1 Sol: 77.0 (#29)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.6 (#218)

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1468 | 1247 |

## Long Context

- GPT-6.1 Sol: 44.9 (#54)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#195)

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1465 | 1272 |

## Writing & Preference

- GPT-6.1 Sol: 63.6 (#63)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.2 (#220)

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1447 | 1272 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1432 | 1226 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1449 | 1252 |

## FAQ

### Is GPT-6.1 Sol better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?

GPT-6.1 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 65.6 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is GPT-6.1 Sol or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?

GPT-6.1 Sol scores higher on coding benchmarks: 63.2 versus 37.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do GPT-6.1 Sol and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-6.1 Sol has 34 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.