# GPT-6.1 Sol vs MiMo-V2-Omni

> MiMo-V2-Omni has enough public results to be ranked (#91); GPT-6.1 Sol does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-vs-mimo-v2-omni
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in coding, where GPT-6.1 Sol leads 51.4 to 42.7.
- MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $10 for GPT-6.1 Sol.
- GPT-6.1 Sol accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.

## Snapshot

| | GPT-6.1 Sol | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 42.1 | 42.9 |
| Rank | — | 91 |
| Context | 1.05M | 262K |
| Input $/M | $2 | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | $10 | $0.28 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- GPT-6.1 Sol: 51.4
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 42.7 (#87)

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | 75.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1467 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GPT-6.1 Sol: 34.3
- MiMo-V2-Omni: —

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | 32% | — |

## Reasoning

- GPT-6.1 Sol: —
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 28.6 (#86)

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1445 |

## Math

- GPT-6.1 Sol: —
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 36.4 (#112)

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1432 |

## Knowledge

- GPT-6.1 Sol: —
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.9 (#114)

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1449 |

## Multimodal

- GPT-6.1 Sol: —
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 37.9 (#62)

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1228 |

## Multilingual

- GPT-6.1 Sol: —
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 52.0 (#97)

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1469 |
| LMArena French | — | 1448 |
| LMArena German | — | 1398 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1318 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1355 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1412 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1432 |

## Instruction Following

- GPT-6.1 Sol: —
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.4 (#62)

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1428 |

## Long Context

- GPT-6.1 Sol: —
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#72)

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1442 |

## Writing & Preference

- GPT-6.1 Sol: —
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.6 (#83)

| Benchmark | GPT-6.1 Sol | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1424 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1393 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1446 |

## FAQ

### Is GPT-6.1 Sol better than MiMo-V2-Omni?

MiMo-V2-Omni has enough public results to be ranked (#91); GPT-6.1 Sol does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### Which is cheaper, GPT-6.1 Sol or MiMo-V2-Omni?

MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; GPT-6.1 Sol lists at $2 and $10.

### Is GPT-6.1 Sol or MiMo-V2-Omni better for coding?

GPT-6.1 Sol scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.4 versus 42.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-6.1 Sol does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

### How many benchmarks do GPT-6.1 Sol and MiMo-V2-Omni share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-6.1 Sol has 2 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Omni has 18.