# GPT-5 Pro vs Qwen3 32B

> GPT-5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 32B costs 34× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gpt-5-pro-vs-qwen3-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5 Pro scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen3 32B in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5 Pro leads 39.2 to 19.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 76.8% for GPT-5 Pro and 54.9% for Qwen3 32B.
- Qwen3 32B is cheaper at $0.70 / $2.80 per million input/output tokens, against $15 / $120 for GPT-5 Pro.
- GPT-5 Pro accepts more context: 400K tokens versus 131K.
- Qwen3 32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | GPT-5 Pro | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 46.2 | 38.8 |
| Rank | 58 | 166 |
| Context | 400K | 131K |
| Input $/M | $15 | $0.70 |
| Output $/M | $120 | $2.80 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- GPT-5 Pro: 43.4 (#77)
- Qwen3 32B: 37.3 (#184)

| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 40% |
| SciCode | — | 35.4% |
| WeirdML | 60.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1358 |
| AlgoTune | 1.31 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- GPT-5 Pro: —
- Qwen3 32B: 32.3 (#58)

| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 48.7% |

## Reasoning

- GPT-5 Pro: 39.2 (#52)
- Qwen3 32B: 19.6 (#233)

| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 76.8% | 54.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 150.26 | 138.51 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 18.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 61.6% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 70.2% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| EnigmaEval | 18.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1335 |
| DTBench | — | 67.5% |
| LMCA | — | 17.3% |

## Math

- GPT-5 Pro: 48.0 (#53)
- Qwen3 32B: 37.9 (#89)

| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 55.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 19.5% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 66.9% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1399 |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 14.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- GPT-5 Pro: 56.2 (#39)
- Qwen3 32B: 40.0 (#112)

| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 65.7% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 31.6% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.9% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1362 |

## Multilingual

- GPT-5 Pro: —
- Qwen3 32B: 45.8 (#162)

| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1317 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1357 |
| LMArena German | — | 1341 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1311 |

## Instruction Following

- GPT-5 Pro: —
- Qwen3 32B: 69.1 (#174)

| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1305 |

## Long Context

- GPT-5 Pro: —
- Qwen3 32B: 43.7 (#83)

| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 74.2% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1327 |

## Writing & Preference

- GPT-5 Pro: —
- Qwen3 32B: 53.1 (#158)

| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1297 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1331 |

## FAQ

### Is GPT-5 Pro better than Qwen3 32B?

GPT-5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 32B costs 34× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, GPT-5 Pro or Qwen3 32B?

Qwen3 32B is cheaper. It lists at $0.70 per million input tokens and $2.80 per million output tokens; GPT-5 Pro lists at $15 and $120.

### Is GPT-5 Pro or Qwen3 32B better for coding?

GPT-5 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.4 versus 37.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5 Pro does, with 400K tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do GPT-5 Pro and Qwen3 32B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5 Pro has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 32B has 26.